Practical AI-guided reflection.
Reflect on relationship choices without labeling people
Explore needs, recurring interactions, safety and the limits of what you can know.
Understand the problem
You can describe an interaction without diagnosing the other person or deciding what they secretly intend. Separate observable events from interpretations, and consider your needs, boundaries and sources of support. A worksheet cannot determine whether you should stay or leave, or evaluate safety comprehensively. Coercion, threats or abuse warrant independent specialist help rather than a joint confrontation.
Take a practical next step
Record one recurring interaction, what you needed, how you responded and what remains unknown. Identify a safe next step that respects both your autonomy and the limits of your control.
A question to consider
What would need to change for this relationship to meet my needs safely?
Sources and scope
Ryan & Deci: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of motivation. Educational coaching and self-reflection, not diagnosis, treatment, legal or financial advice. You decide what fits your circumstances. If you are unsafe or in immediate danger, seek appropriate local emergency or specialist support.